子机构
400-600-1123
logo 备考资讯 提分课程 公开课 答疑社区 申友FM
登录
注册
题库解析   >   特殊套路型 题型   >  
本题由lindy提供
3396 次学习

In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leaders of the United States, Ralph Ketcham argues

that the first six Presidents differed decisively from later Presidents because the first six held values inherited from the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England. In this view, government was designed not to satisfy the private desires of the people but to make them better citizens; this tradition stressed the disinterested devotion of political leaders to the public good. Justice, wisdom, and courage were more important qualities in a leader than the ability to organize voters and win elections. Indeed, leaders were supposed to be called to office rather than to run for office. And if they took up the burdens of public office with a sense of duty, leaders also believed that such offices were naturally their due because of their social preeminence or their contributions to the country. Given this classical conception of leadership, it is not surprising that the first six Presidents condemned political parties. Parties were partial by definition, self-interested, and therefore serving something other than the transcendent public good.

Even during the first presidency (Washington's), however, the classical conception of virtuous leadership was being undermined by commercial forces that had been gathering since at least the beginning of the eighteenth century. Commerce--its profit-making, its self-interestedness, its individualism--became the enemy of these classical ideals. Although Ketcham does not picture the struggle in quite this way, he does rightly see Jackson's tenure (the seventh presidency) as the culmination of the acceptance of party, commerce, and individualism. For the Jacksonians, nonpartisanship lost its relevance, and under the direction of Van Buren, party gained a new legitimacy. The classical ideals of the first six Presidents became identified with a privileged aristocracy, an aristocracy that had to be overcome in order to allow competition between opposing political interests. Ketcham is so strongly committed to justifying the classical ideals, however, that he underestimates the advantages of their decline. For example, the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately associated with the legitimacy of opposing political parties.

The passage is primarily concerned with


    (A) describing and comparing two theories about the early history of the United States

    (B) describing and analyzing an argument about the early history of the United States

    (C) discussing new evidence that qualifies a theory about the early history of the United States

    (D) refuting a theory about political leadership in the United States

    (E) resolving an ambiguity in an argument about political leadership in the United States 


登录申友GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

暂无视频解析,点击获取更多视频内容

文字解析

答案:
B
(A)描述和比
较关于美国的早期历史的学说。文中不涉及到两个观点。 (B)Correct。描述和分析关于美国的早期历史的一个观点。 (C)讨论限定一个关于美国的早期历史的学说的新证据。作者在文中没有提到过相应的证据。只是单纯的评述“Ralph Ketcham”观点。 (D)反对一个关于美国政治领导的学说。首先作者并没有完全反对“Ralph Ketcham”的学说。其次这个学说并不是完全讲关于政治领导的,是一个关于美国早期历史的学说。 (E)解决一个关于美国的早期历史的一个观点中的矛盾。文中没有提到有矛盾的观点。

GMAT会员

提交
OG视频
申友gmat小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

100蜜糖购买当前课程

当前蜜糖数:颗 去获取

立即购买 取消购买

吉祥物小蜜蜂

关注公众号

公众号

扫码关注申友GMAT公众号

立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

微信咨询

申友在线咨询二维码图片

扫码添加申友GMAT官方助手

立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

联系申友 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282