子机构
400-600-1123
logo GMAT备考资讯 答疑社区 GMAT公开课 提分课程

城市电话

申友-中心

免费咨询

咨询热线:

地址:
登录
注册

我的备考方案

获取方案

题库解析   >   其他题型   >   自测章RC49-65
    本题由hyman1提供
65次学习
自测章RC49-65

The idea of the brain as an information processor—a machine manipulating blips of energyaccording to fathomable rules—has come todominate neuroscience. However, one enemy of the brain-as-computer metaphor is John R. Searle,a philosopher who argues that since computerssimply follow algorithms, they cannot deal with important aspects of human thought such asmeaning and content. Computers are syntactic, rather than semantic, creatures. People, on the other hand, understand meaning because they have something Searle obscurely calls the causal powers of the brain.Yet how would a brain work if not by reducing what it learns about the world to information—some kind of code that can be transmitted from neuron to neuron? What else could meaning and content be? If the code can be cracked, a computer should be able to simulate it, at least in principle. But even if a computer could simulate the workingsof the mind, Searle would claim that the machinewould not really be thinking; it would just be actingas if it were. His argument proceeds thus: if acomputer were used to simulate a stomach, with the stomach’s churnings faithfully reproduced on a video screen, the machine would not be digestingreal food. It would just be blindly manipulating the symbols that generate the visual display.Suppose, though, that a stomach were simulated using plastic tubes, a motor to do the churning, a supply of digestive juices, and a timing mechanism.If food went in one end of the device, what came out the other end would surely be digested food. Brains,unlike stomachs, are information processors, and if one information processor were made to simulate another information processor, it is hard to see how one and not the other could be said to think. imulated thoughts and real thoughts are made ofthe same element: information. The representations of the world that humans carry around in their heads are already simulations. To accept Searle’s argument,one would have to deny the most fundamental notionin psychology and neuroscience: that brains work by processing information.

The main purpose of the passage is to

    <p>(A) propose an experiment<br/>(B) analyze a function<br/>(C) refute an argument<br/>(D) explain a contradiction<br/>(E) simulate a process</p>
登录申友留学,查看答案及解析
答案:
C

参与讨论

提交
吉祥物小蜜蜂
联系申友 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

友情链接: 申友雅思 | 申友留学 | 申友GMAT官方微博 | 申友GMAT官方知乎机构账号

Copyright © 2020 All Right Reserved 申友教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-4 免责声明